{"id":283,"date":"2011-11-07T00:00:17","date_gmt":"2011-11-07T08:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/?p=283"},"modified":"2011-11-07T00:36:59","modified_gmt":"2011-11-07T08:36:59","slug":"how-i-almost-lost-my-adoration-for-queers-for-economic-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/entry\/283","title":{"rendered":"How I am on the verge of losing my adoration for Queers for Economic Justice"},"content":{"rendered":"

Queers for Economic Justice<\/a> is an organization in New York that I have long admired, so I was really excited when my friend invited me to its fundraiser\/party this past week. Citing a series of parties with racist\/colonialist themes that are happening around the city during Halloween season, the QEJ party which took place at Bartini Ultra Lounge (a gay male venue) was tagged as “Party Without Oppression.” But the main drag performer for the night posted something weird on the event’s facebook page<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Divine Grace<\/b> Super-fantastic. I apologize in advance if my song offends anyone who may be a prostitute.
\nOctober 26 at 3:26pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

I thought it was odd that she had to “apologize in advance” to prostitutes, so I asked a question.<\/p>\n

\n

Emi Koyama<\/b> Are you saying that your song is offensive? Or just being super sensitive? I’m all for nasty, but not for things that are mean to prostitutes.
\nOctober 27 at 8:21am<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

I waited for three days, but I did not receive a response so I wrote another comment.<\/p>\n

\n

Emi Koyama<\/b> Not getting a response and I am starting to wonder if I read the title of the event wrong. Perhaps it meant to say Party with Oppression.
\nOctober 30 at 10:27am<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

At this point, Brandon Lacy Campos from QEJ and Divine both replied.<\/p>\n

\n

Brandon Lacy Campos<\/b> Hey Emi…thanks for posting your concerns to Grace. I know she has had out of state company for the last few days, so perhaps giving a little lee way for a response. I will also check in with her. QEJ supports sex work and the right to provide for oneself using whatever means one has and to be able to do so with dignity. I will not censor Graces choice of performance number, but also please know that she is a comedic writer so there should be no assumptions made that derive from her magical ability to piss everyone off with a few simple words….until we know exactly what she meant by it. Also know that Grace is wicked but works for justice every bit as much as we do, which is why she was invited to perform. Be welcome.
\nOctober 31 at 8:47am<\/p>\n

Divine Grace<\/b> Perhaps I would just be better suited emceeing this event rather than performing. My act tends to be pretty low rent and it already appears that I am offending guests.
\nOctober 31 at 1:32pm<\/p>\n

Divine Grace<\/b> And Emi, just so you know, and just so your children will someday know, my intent has never been nor ever will be to oppress. As Brandon has stated, I have put in 20+ years at the office in an effort to garner equality and justice for the LGBT community.
\nOctober 31 at 1:35pm<\/p>\n

Brandon Lacy Campos<\/b> The hell you will.
\nOctober 31 at 1:35pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

I appreciate the fact that “QEJ supports sex work,” but they are not addressing my concern. I was not concerned about whether or not her performance piss people off in general, but I wanted to know why she singled out prostitutes as one group she intended to “apologize in advance.” Also, her threatening to cancel her performance fully knowing that she is the main attraction for the event and that QEJ would not cancel her just because one prostitute is upset with her seems manipulative.<\/p>\n

I wrote:<\/p>\n

\n

Emi Koyama<\/b> It doesn’t seem that either of you answered my question. My question wasn’t whether or not you are a good person, or your act tend to offend people. It was whether or not your act is mean to prostitutes.
\nNovember 1 at 4:43am<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

To which Divine wrote:<\/p>\n

\n

Divine Grace<\/b> Emi, darling, my act is never mean. Tacky? Yes. Tasteless? Probably. Vulgar? Always. But my act isn’t “mean” to prostitutes unless you take Kim Kardashian’s feelings into consideration. Now, is there anything else that I owe you, and how quickly should I respond before you get huffy again?
\nNovember 1 at 1:16pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

I am glad to hear that her act “is never mean” to prostitutes, but she is continuing to engage in manipulative behavior with this fake passivity. I wrote:<\/p>\n

\n

Emi Koyama<\/b> I would have appreciated that clarification earlier, but after witnessing how you can make such mean-spirited comments toward me about how you are not mean, I don’t have very much faith.
\nNovember 1 at 5:01pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

This brought further ridicule, belittlement, and insult from Divine:<\/p>\n

\n

Divine Grace<\/b> And after seeing that you consider the word “huffy” mean-spirited, I have no faith that you could sit through an episode of “Dora the Explorer” without curling up fetal.
\nNovember 1 at 5:03pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Immediately after this, Divine changed sharing setting of this thread to make it invisible from me, so that the personal attack remained on the event wall while depriving me of the ability to respond. At first I thought that she had deleted the thread, but my friend pointed out that she could see the exchange from her account, and allowed me to copy the content.<\/p>\n

Finally, Brandon further adds insult:<\/p>\n

\n

Brandon Lacy Campos<\/b> Emi. I appreciate your concern, but I clearly indicated that QEJ supports sex workers. While I appreciate that you may have perceived that Divine’s comment was “mean” to you. It is clear that something about it triggered something for you, which is a valid experience, but I assure you nothing “mean” was said to you. QEJ would never invite a performer to share space with us if that person actively participated in oppression towards a community. Having said that…satire and comedy often intersect at an individuals personal experience and just because something make you feel uncomfortable does not mean that it was unjust or mean.
\nNovember 1 at 5:13pm<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Brandon seems to be employing the infamous Bush administration rhetoric on torture: the United States does not practice torture, and therefore what its military is doing in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere are not torture. Similarly, since QEJ supports sex workers, nothing it does can possibly amount to attacks on prostitutes or those who stand up for prostitutes; since QEJ never invites a performer who is oppressive, nothing the performer does would amount to oppressive acts. I am astonished by the use of anti-oppression policies and principles as a tool to invisibilize and therefore support oppressive acts. To suggest that I merely “perceived” meanness in Divine’s comments, or that I was merely “triggered” is invalidating and insulting, and seriously undermines my trust in QEJ’s ability to advocate for sex workers and others facing multiple oppressions. <\/p>\n

I was going to just give up and not deal with QEJ in the future, until someone pointed out to me that QEJ’s interim director is Amber Hollibaugh, who is one of my superheroes in the social justice movements and the author of “My Dangerous Desires: A Queer Girl Dreaming Her Way Home,” which is also one of my all-time most favourite books in the whole world. I love and trust Amber so I wrote her an email to alert her what has happened under her watch. I hope that she will reply to me in such way that restores my trust in and support for an organization that deserves much better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Queers for Economic Justice is an organization in New York that I have long admired, so I was really excited when my friend invited me to its fundraiser\/party this past week. Citing a series of parties with racist\/colonialist themes that are happening around the city during Halloween season, the QEJ party which took place at […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13,6],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eminism.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}